What an uneven, K-shaped recovery of education really looks like

Earlier this year, I thought that relying on Kovid-1 and consequently distance learning would be the catalyst for radical innovation. We were at the peak of change and there was one Essential To innovate. However, falling, we understand that we are a thin area.

Recently, a local reporter asked me to call which school districts caught the innovations born out of the need for an epidemic and adapted them to a large scale. I didn’t have a good answer. I ran about Chromebooks and more kids with internet access, school bus delays and the possibility of Adtech, but she didn’t find it.

Finally, I would say I can point her to a handful of schools that were already on the path to innovation and used the accompaniment as an accelerator for change initiatives.

As tracked by K-shaped recovery economists, Our education recovery will be similar. While private schools have seen limited disruption, some stable, public school districts have used the epidemic catalyst to advance individual learning initiatives and implement more experimental curricula. Increasingly, however, more public schools are struggling with open needs – extreme scarcity Bus driver, Food service delivery, And Alternate teacher. These operational hurdles are now bleeding to disrupt the instruction.

It is difficult to make a radical change without meeting basic needs.

At the recent baby shower for the local education leader, attended by principals and teachers, the conversation quickly turned to the challenges of the new academic year. One teacher summed up the issues of returning to school this fall as “grief, pressure and connection”.

In Kansas City, where most of the partner organizations where my organization works are school based, we endured Record breaking school violence In the last two years. While two principals talk about losing several students in just 6 weeks of the school year, active shooter drills need to be deployed. In a year that has been characterized by so much loss, our schools are struggling to cope with the amazing tragedy.

Then there’s the pressure to put it all together. Despite the lack of bus driver / food service / alternative, despite the grief, the pressure to show educational benefits against the loss of learning is real. Schools are heavily deployed ESSER funding to support high dose teaching programs And individual interventions, which are geared to target a wide range of learning experiences students have experienced over the past two academic years. Meanwhile, the rolling outbreaks of Kovid-1rol are isolating entire classrooms and grade-levels. Many schools have abandoned their hybrid / distance learning models, leaving students to defend themselves if exposed. How do we speed up student learning in such an inconsistent situation?

Finally – after all the months of detachment, our students and teachers are looking forward to the connection. After months of shapeless days, teachers and students are struggling to reconcile with the structured growth in classroom life, perhaps never right for the intricacies of the emotions that enter the classroom. My 6-year-old nephew (who spent my kindergarten years with my mother in distance learning through homeschooling) keeps it well … “After all this time, when are we going to play?” He asked. How do our teachers and students find the time to process, heal, adapt, and reconnect?

Balance progress with compassion

At the end of the conversation with the reporter, she asked, “So what do we do next?” I’m not sure the right answer. All I know is that the whole disruptive innovation that we think could happen in the field of education has not happened this fall. Instead, we are dealing with a system whose thread-bare infrastructure has become painfully clear. We need to make teaching more sustainable. We need reliable infrastructure that transports and nurtures children consistently and safely. We need ways to facilitate more honest human connections.

Most likely, we need an industry account. More equitable, flexible, and sustainable state funding formulas for schools can allow teachers to support complex issues entering their classrooms. We need strategic reform that weighs on children’s socio-emotional health and measures their educational growth in parallel with their overall academic achievement. We need to invest in research and development so that we can find technological solutions, veterinarians and scales that make life easier for students, parents and teachers.

And how we study these measures is important. It is important that the innovation process is holistic and based on the skills and living experience of teachers, students and parents. At my organization, LeanLab Education, we focus on measuring and improving learning technology products. The school community we work with tells us their biggest challenges, we match them to an Adtech product, and we create a specific research study that all three – researchers, developers and teachers – adapt to the school context and give teachers proof of that. Informative decisions must be made.

This kind of co-designed innovation may not be as fast as we would like. It is a process that returns power to teachers, parents and students. This may be less “efficient” than top-down improvements, but for innovation to be truly sustainable, the skills of those with living experience must be incorporated. At the moment, we are all trying to balance progress and compassion but we have learned that these goals are not mutually exclusive, they work in harmony. In fact, the only way to make progress right now is through compassion.


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *